The Lost World Civilization
there are no documentary records of Neolithic traditions - but we know
that the Sumerians and Ancient Egyptians specifically stated that a
group of people with, what appeared to them to be, god-like powers
arrived from somewhere unknown to instruct them in the sciences and
teach them skills in manufacturing. These
thought of as gods, but it is said that they looked like normal people
and they lived and died just like everyone else. While it is
fashionable today to dismiss old myth and legend as little more than
fairy stories, we believe that this explanation holds more water than
any other. Is this solution so preposterous that we have to overlook
the obvious? Stepping back from the arrogance of the belief that our
current civilization simply has to be the pinnacle of all human
achievement leaves us wondering, ‘Why on Earth do we have to
accuse our forebears of writing down nonsense?’ The first
response of any archaeologist to this thesis will be, ‘So
is the archaeological evidence to support the notion of such a group of
advanced people?’ This is an entirely fair and reasonable
question but our answer lies in information that we have brought
forward from our forensic examination of measurement systems. The
evidence outlined in this book appears to have demolished the standard
idea that there was a slow, incremental improvement of
humankind’s understanding of science and nature from Stone
Internet Age. Like Charles Dickens’ Mr. Gradgrind, we love
and we set out to find more facts than had previously been available.
The whole idea of a ‘Civilization One’ is not going
appeal to many academics - and we fully understand why. This kind of
notion has to be treated with great caution. Yet it does explain how
these fantastically sophisticated units existed in cultures that were
otherwise rather unsophisticated. Could it be that there was once a
single, highly-advanced group that virtually kick-started the
world’s first civilizations? If so, it appears that it failed
the case of the Megalithic culture because it seems to have died
out...Others may identify a different solution, but in our estimation
it would be impossible to create this interrelated Megalithic/
Mesopotamian measurement matrix from a cold start. In other words, the
Earth, Moon and Sun as well as the speed of light and the orbiting
Earth would have to be measured using some arbitrary units before it
would be possible to create units that produced such wonderful integer
results. If we are correct regarding this point, the inference has to
be that Civilization One was as advanced as the modern world, though
far, far back in time during the period we refer to as prehistoric."
Alan Butler went to work with Christopher Knight, and together they
authored an excellent book on the significance of the Megalithic Yard.
In this book, entitled Civilization One: The World Is Not As You
Thought It Was, Butler and Knight successfully demolish the long
accepted fallacies concerning the primitivism of ancient man. They
term "Elder Culture" seems to be a term created by Andrew Collins. This
term may relate to "elder gods" of the Titan/Olympian gods of the
T.C. Lethbridge, formerly of the Cambridge Archeology Museum, suggested
an alternative perception of mythologized traditions. Lethbridge
concluded that the traditional enigma of instructional "gods," is that
the traditions are histories. Myths were historical memories of
possible relationships, which tradition holders were at a loss to
totally comprehend. An example is the account of Ptah, one of Egypt's
greatest "gods." Ptah was a creator of things. In the Pyramid Text of
Teta, Ptah is the owner of a "workshop." He was a great worker in
metals, a master architect. Egyptologists consider Ptah mythological.
Yet, it is Ptah to whom Egyptians credit giving them their cultural
knowledge. What is interesting, is that the early Egyptians created the
greatest of all megalithic wonders of the world - the Great Pyramid -
and never, in all Egyptian texts, do they take credit for it? What they
do is defer to an archetype/role model for having given them basic
gods Move West
Egypt is known as the Land of the Pharaohs. Perhaps it should be known as the Land of the Neters. The roots of Egypt's grand civilization starts with the Neters the "civilizer Gods". Since you have gotten this far it should come as no surprise that the terms civilizer gods rings a bell. Neter means "guardian" or "Watcher". As these early Egyptians tell it themselves these Neters journeyed from the "land of Ur" and that they came from the south by boat. These gods were both superhuman and mortal. What we see here is the spread of civilization to the world from a tradition rooted in Mesopotamia. You will find it in India and you will find it in Mesoamerica. When the tools of civilization arrive so do the legends of anthropomorphic gods who are divine yet mortal. Authoritatively intellectual, undeniable in their leadership capabilities, always recognized as the carriers of an ancient high culture these inventive and far roaming Andites spread civilization to the world at large.
"But before we deal with that city situated on the plains of Shinar (SHU.MER/Sumer/Sumeria ) we must give some background on the pre dynastic, even pre historic "history" of Kemet. As the Egyptian mythologies tell us, the Black Land was, in it's early stages, a land of low civilization where religion/science was not known and even the practice of cannibalism was prevalent. That is until the civilizers... those worshiped as Gods by later generations of Egyptians came from the far off "olden land". The "civilizer Gods" were called Neters ( NTR ) which according to comparisons with other Semetic languages means "Guardian" or "Watcher". These Neters had supposedly arrived in Kemet by boat from the Red Sea ( there is also evidence to suggest that these same Neters had been present in the Horn of Africa and West Africa at earlier dates than their arrival in Egypt ) or Sea of UR which they had entered via Ta Neter ( Ta Neter meant "Place/Land of the Neters/Gods" ) which is the narrow straights at the southern end of the Red Sea now called Bab'el'Mandeb. These Neters journey had originated in Ta UR ( Ta UR meant "the olden land" or more simply "Place/Land of Ur" ) which could be reached by exiting the Red Sea and following the coast towards the left. This type of course would have led a traveler towards the Persian gulf, towards Mesopotamia and Sumer!
So according to their own
admission, the "civilizer Gods" of the Egyptians, called Neters or
"Guardians/Watchers" had originated in a place called "the land of Ur"
which could be located somewhere in the area of the ancient Middle East
called Sumer. The place name Ur is of course known as the starting
point of the travels of the Hebrew Isra'Elite patriarch Abraham."
"During the fabled "First Time, Zep Tepi, when the
gods ruled in their country: they said it was a golden age during which
the waters of the abyss receded, the primordial darkness was banished,
and humanity, emerging into the light, was offered the gifts of
civilization. They spoke also of intermediaries between gods and men -
the Urshu, a category of lesser divinities whose title meant 'the
Watchers'. And they preserved particularly vivid recollections of the
gods themselves, puissant and beautiful beings called the Neteru who
lived on earth with humankind and exercised their sovereignty from
Heliopolis and other sanctuaries up and down the Nile. Some of these
Neteru were male and some female but all possessed a range of
supernatural powers which included the ability to appear, at will, as
men or women, or as animals, birds, reptiles, trees or plants.
Paradoxically, their words and deeds seem to have reflected human
passions and preoccupations. Likewise, although they were portrayed as
stronger and more intelligent than humans, it was believed that they
could grow sick - or even die, or be killed - under certain
"...during the mythical age of the gods, the Zep
Tepi, or First Time. As has been ably demonstrated by recent works from
Hancock, Bauval et al, this believed mythical age, when gods ruled the
earth, appears to have been an actual stage of human development
pre-dating Pharaonic Egypt by many thousands of years."
Evidence of Archaeology
Neither in Egypt or in Babylonia has any beginning of civilization been found. As far back as archaeology can carry us, man is already civilized, building cities and temples, carving hard stone into artistic form, and even employing a system of pictorial record...The fact is very remarkable in view of modern theories of development and of the evolution of civilization out of barbarism...In any case, the culture and civilization of Egypt and Babylonia appear to spring into existence already fully developed. Archaeology at all events has failed to discover the elements out of which they ought to have grown...
Some sites in Syria bear witness to this same
peculiar aspect of Middle East cultures. T. J. Meek in this connection
This then seems to be the picture. Somewhere in this Iranian highland a small group of people settled who needed little time to develop sufficiently to create the later culture complex which characterized first of all Jarmo and then Sialk. From here, or from some similar site in about the same stages of development, emigrants set out towards the West to settle finally at Tell Halaf. Others went south, dividing into two bands, the one passing around the lower end of the Zagros Mountains where they came up into the plains of Mesopotamia from the south, and the other turning to the east and finally establishing themselves in the Indus Valley. From Mesopotamia and Northern Syria it seems, more adventurous spirits traveled on until they reached Lower and Upper Egypt. And all this took place within a remarkably short time...
It is important to observe the sequence of events. First, for perhaps a quarter of a million years, intelligent men, to all intents and purposes apparently much like ourselves, advanced their culture scarcely at all. Then appeared a settlement in the Iranian Highlands near the traditional site of the landing of the Ark, which within a period of perhaps 1500 years evolved into a culture in the Mesopotamian plains which in turn, within a thousand years, developed into a series of high cultures scarcely paralleled until comparatively modern times. And finally, after this sudden burst of activity lasting possibly a further 1000 years, which witnessed some of the greatest cultural achievements in Babylonia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley which the world has known, the process once more slowed up until many prosperous centers decayed and disappeared, and much of India, Africa, and Europe remained in a state of semi-barbarism till well on towards Roman times, and in some instances much later.
The sequence is, then, an unbelievably long time
with almost no growth; a sudden spurt leading within a very few
centuries to remarkably high culture; a gradual slowing up, and decay;
followed only much later by recovery of lost arts and by development of
new ones, finally creating our modern world."
is chiefly by the many thousand broken pieces of pottery
found in the lowest deposits of the Susa mound that the story has been
built up, bit by bit, of these unknown immigrants from an unknown land;
something like the reconstruction of the unseen, lame, half-blind camel
in "The Arabian Nights." This pottery is wonderfully hard and thin, not
much thicker than a couple of postcards, and it rings like porcelain,
though it is not so transparent. The forms are simple and graceful;
they were produced on a rudimentary potter's wheel, used with a skill
that was probably due to the inherited experience of many generations
of craftsmen. Nearly all the bowls and vases were elaborately decorated
either inside or outside with strange designs, most of which have no
similarity with any designs found in other parts of the world, so that
we have no due to the country where these potters learned their art,
though we can be fairly sure that they brought it from some centre of
civilization where it had been undergoing a long period of development.
For it is now admitted that ornamental designs in all countries and in
all ages are not the chance product of the craftsman's brain-they have
a regular evolution from the simple to the complex, most of the simple
designs being evidently based on natural forms of men or animals."
The Megalithic occurs in parallel with the Neolithic, the New Stone Age and spans into the age of metals. If we accept the date of 9,000 B.C. for Göbekli Tepe then the start of the Megalithic has its first evidence at about the same time as for the Neolithic. Not only that but at Çayönü the use of copper has been found and dated to somewhere around 7,000 B.C. The term Megalithic means very large stones (used in structures). Just previous to the Neolithic is the Mesolithic Age when hunting and gathering were all the rage. It was the Neolithic when things really started to happen and it very roughly dates between10,000 and 2,000 B.C. overlapping the ages of metal. The end of the Neolithic is open ended due to the varying technological advances of differing locations. All dates relating to these differing ages are relative as they do not appear within a smooth continuum. Rather they come into being at differtent times in different places so using "about" is appropriate. Thus there are many differing opinions about these dates. The starting date for the Neolithic on this website is based upon the beginning of farming in Anatolia. Also all dates regarding the beginnings of civilization are being pushed back farther into the past.
The engineers of the megalithic monuments were the Andites. They were big thinkers as evidenced by what they built. Not only were these constructions impressively large but many contain methods and meanings not which all is understood. When looking at the scope of these projects like Baalbek, Stonehenge and the pyramids one is drawn to the conclusion that whoever oversaw these constructions were well informed civil engineers skilled in mathmatics, geometry and astronomy. These people who carried megalithic building skills were seemingly professionals schooled in many disciplines. Concerning astronomy if you were really really smart you would be aware of the precession of the equinoxes and they were. Yes, cave men sitting around the fire discussing the problem of sighting the point in empty space upon which the wobble of the earth's rotation revolves around. I love this stuff. To understand astronomy requires a long time of observation over the lifetimes of many generations. Then you would have to accumulate these observations and continue to pass on this collective knowledge over an enormous length of time. As to passing on of this knowledge one theory has it that the structures encoded the math and geometry as a pneumonic device that would last long after the original builders were gone. This knowledge of say knowing the earth was a sphere and that latitude affected observation would help you navigate vast distances over land or water and discover America in 2200 BC.
This sophisticated knowledge always passed through the ancient shamans. They were the carriers of culture. They were the lawyers, doctors and politicians all rolled into one. They became priest kings. But the crux of the argument is this: to explain how geometry and astronomy combined with mathematics was laid down by a Paleolithic culture which used such knowledge to build these awesome structures with no previous evidence or source from which such knowledge was drawn. The megalithic culture (first world civilization) was a world wide phenomenon.
After 10,000 BC Megalithic culture started to spread. One main reason for this is climate. We must never underestimate the importance of climate in the spread of culture. The last ice age was ending and it was getting dryer. As the glaciers retreated avenues opened for migration to the north. The way to the north and west had been blocked by the expanded Mediterranean which connected with the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. (The expanded Black sea is called the New Euxine Lake.)
Examples of What They Built
Copper Slab Saws
The Egyptians used the copper slab saw, a toothless band of copper, that used an abrasive to cut through the stone. There is undisputed evidence that slab saws were used to cut stone blocks in Egypt. Note how the slab saw to the left could be used to clean up the adjoining faces insuring a very tight fit when pushed together. The Egyptians also used circular saws. However the question as to who used the saws first still remains unanswered. No one knows how old Baalbek is where there is evidence that saws were used to cut stone. The marks are from a circular saw. Friedrich Ragette suggests that a circular saw with a radius of 4 meters was used in the quarrying of Baalbek's largest blocks. This would mean the saw blade would be about 26 and a quarter feet in diameter.
(Ragette, Baalbek, p. 115 1980 from: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/arqueologia/esp_baalbek_4.htm).
Copper Boring Tools
As with slab saws there is unquestionable proof that the ancient Egyptians used copper boring tubes also called bow drills. These copper tools have been shown to work but the stone ate the copper at a fast ratio of approximately 3:1. That is one inch of cutting used three inches of copper. The Egyptian illustration is from inside the Saqqara pyramid. So at the time of the building of Egypt's first pyramid the bow drill was already in use. Examples of both saw and drill technologies are in the Cairo museum. Use of the copper boring tool can be also found at ancient Argob. Sketches made of the hard black basalt window shutters at Argob have cleanly bored holes through them.
Bronze and Iron
"On Friday May 26th 1837, during the Vyse excavations at Giza, one of the excavators, J R Hill, found an iron plate embedded in the cement of an inner joint at the southern `Star Shaft' of the Kings Chamber. It was around 12 by 4 inches and 1/8th of an inch thick. 1 More interestingly it was deeply embedded in the masonry and had to be removed by blasting apart the outer two tiers of stones.
1989 a fragment was taken from the plate found by Hill, and was tested
by two eminent metallurgists Jones and Gayer who concluded that it was
very ancient. Significantly they stated that the metallurgical evidence
supported the archaeological evidence that it was incorporated within
the pyramid when it was built. More importantly they went on to
determine that the iron was not meteoritic, had been smelted at a
temperature of between 1000 and 1100 degrees centigrade, and bore
traces of gold on one of the surfaces of the plate.
What holds back the acceptance of iron in antiquity, apart from the rarity of finds, is the erroneous assumption that it must have been poured to make it useable....A temperature as low as 900° Centigrade in a charcoal furnace will easily separate iron from its ore....To smelt copper from its common ore of Malachite a temperature of between 700° and 800° is required, which would easily have been achieved by the kilns of the ancient world." (http://www.gizagrid.com/egyptian_iron.html © Keith Squires 2005)
Keith Squires goes into much more detail on the ancient smelting of metals and makes a convincing argument for dating the smelting of iron both in Anatolia and Egypt to a much earlier time. He also explains why the scarcity of metal from this very early time frame and the technology of these early furnaces to smelt copper and iron.
"The earliest iron was probably a byproduct of copper smelting, as copper ores almost always contain iron. Chalcopyrite, for example, contains about thirty percent iron. When iron ore was smelted, what would be produced would be a spongy mass of iron, slag, and cinders which has to be hammered to remove the slag and air bubbles. This was so-called wrought iron. Wrought iron was forged while still in its heated, soft, and ductile state." (http://www.asa3.org/aSA/PSCF/1993/PSCF12-93Yamauchi.html ©1993 EDWIN YAMAUCHI Department of History, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056)
These two above authors taken together demonstarte that the chances of iron smelting by the Egyptians is wholly probable even unto the time of the building the pyramids at Giza. The Egyptian mined tons and tons of copper. Even if there was only a small amount of iron present it still would have been a considerable amount. The Egyptians did smelt copper and had furnaces that could have smelted iron. This hot iron could have been hammered into useful tools and implements. A French archaeologist named Gaston Camille Charles Maspero wrote a book called a MANUAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY and Guide to the Study of Antiquities in Egypt. It was published in 1895. In it he also argues for the use of iron tools by the Egyptians explaining that only iron could work stone as hard as diorite, basalt, and the granite of Syene. As for losing their edge the tools would be returned to the forge to be fixed. This observation was made by M. Maspero first hand of local artisans sculpting stone statues for tourists while in Egypt. (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14400/14400-h/14400-h.htm)
Megalithic Tool Kit:Copper and Bronze - Megalithic building spanned both the Copper 5500 BC and Bronze 2250 BC Ages
Wheel - discovered by the Sumerians but may have been used by the Egyptians
Levers - probably one of the first simple machines discovered
Wedge - Egyptian
Copper slab saws and copper boring drills - Egyptian
Counterweights - Egyptians knew how to use them at the time they built the pyramids
Surveying Skills - self evident
Mathematics/Geometry - this has been confirmed through reversed engineering
Astronomy - same as above
Standard Units of Measure - the "megalithic yard"
Some theorists suggest that
a simple machine using levers and counterweights was used to elevate
the blocks. Such a machine, called a shadoof, has existed in Egypt for
millennia and is still used to elevate pots full of water from the Nile
River to the irrigation canals. Though a shadoof itself could never
lift a 2.5-ton block, engineer Olaf Tellefsen (1970) observed three men
using a similar machine to lift very large stones while he was riding
up the Nile. Even so, a few considerations must be met before one can
propose a machine that could be used on the GP. First, it must fit and
be capable of operation on the pyramid's stepped face. Second, it must
be manageable and controllable so that damage would not be done to the
blocks being lifted and so that workers would face a minimal risk of
falling or being knocked off the edge. Third, it should be simple so as
to align as closely as possible with the scant archaeological record
that such machines can claim. Finally, it must be capable of lifting at
least 5000-6000 pounds."
Why the Megalithic Culture did not Survive
There was a long and very slow evolutionary growth of human knowledge that was radically up stepped by the ideas, ideals and technology of Eden. This high culture of Eden was carried out to the emerging world by the Andites - the pre Sumarian stock that came to be in the fertile crescent. The Urantia Book describes the circumstances that lead to the appearance of these Andites. First these gifted people were part Adamite, part Nodite and the rest indigenous human. They made their appearance in the fertile crescent and not in southern Mesopotamia. It was in the region of the fertile crescent where the Adamites and Nodites migrating outward to this pastoral land, interbred with the original inhabitants and started the cultural revolution that would encompass the entire planet. This is the megalithic culture that some archaeologists speculate as the "hidden high culture" found around the world. Theological concepts from Mesopotamia found in Mesoamerica, tobacco and cocaine found in Egyptian mummies, stepped pyramids found in China, dolmens found in Korea and the academic jury is still out as to how all of this fits together. But eventually numbers won out and the overwhelming genetic pool of indigenous peoples absorbed the Andites into their ranks. When the Andites were gone so was their culture.
"These civilizations [Indus Valley Civilization, the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Mesoamerican cultures] were formed fully intact with no known pre-cursors having fully formed sophisticated writing, mathematical and technological systems. These civilizations had advanced medical knowledge, agriculture and law. All of these civilizations claim that they got their knowledge directly from their celestial gods and goddesses. These civilizations also claim that their “Gods” actually established “Kingship” and sat the thrones of their lands from earliest history.
One accepted theory of the time strongly argues that there had to have been an as yet unnamed or undiscovered civilization whose influence must have spread independently to each of these civilizations. This theory would best explain the common features and the fundamental differences between one civilization and the next...
Another example of diffusion is the history of
human languages. Almost all the languages of Europe, Asia and
northern India share enough common points of vocabulary, syntax and
usage that it’s obvious they stem from a single
“Proto-Indo-European Language group”."
One reason why there were Edenic influences moderately intact is the Andite domestication of the horse. It was the speed of the horse that allowed culture to spread to the west in a more cohesive fashion. As far as migrating into India the Andites were first known as the Dravidians and later as the Aryans. In fact anywhere culture has been discovered the Andites were there first. This culture included agriculture (and therefore stone circles), metallurgy, writing, legends and of course megalithic building skills.
Making the Stone Weightless
Archimedes once said, "Give me a place to stand and I will move the earth". We will move something slightly smaller. When moving a stone of great weight from point A to point B there are only two things to consider: raising the block and moving that block forward. The technique discussed on this page is credited to W.T. Wallington where I first encountered it. It was from his web site at http://www.theforgottentechnology.com that I first learned these principles involved for accomplishing this task. If you wish to see how this is done he has videos for sale demonstrating how he moves large concrete slabs. Also his web site has images of his experimentation with this technique. There are other web sites that duplicate the technique of raising the stone but use a different way to move the stone forward.
the Stone Forward